← All customer stories
Craft drinks · UK distillery

The Rum Infusionist

I built Scarif because I'm running a rum distillery and I don't have time to be a marketing agency. The tool exists because I needed it.

Tom Conway, Founder & distiller · theruminfusionist.com
£14K → £1,788/yr
Marketing tool stack cost
Replaced Klaviyo + Canva + Triple Whale + Loomly + ChatGPT Plus + Hotjar + a strategy consultant with a single Scarif Studio subscription.
~5 min
Time to first ad
From a blank brand voice to a Meta-ready ad creative.
10×
Ad creative volume
Same effort, ten times the output. All matched to brand voice.
7
Tools replaced
Klaviyo, Canva, ChatGPT, Loomly, Hotjar, Triple Whale, external strategy consultant.
4.88★
Customer rating maintained
Brand voice consistency stayed high through the migration — review averages didn't dip.
£0
Money on agencies
TRI was paying a freelance copywriter + a part-time graphic designer. Both replaced by the engine.

The Frankenstein stack

Before Scarif, TRI's marketing was a mess of disconnected tools. Klaviyo for emails (£500/mo at scale). Canva Pro for ad and post designs (£12/mo, plus the time to use it). ChatGPT Plus for copywriting drafts (£20/mo, plus context-pasting). Loomly for scheduling (£35/mo). Triple Whale to figure out attribution (£300/mo, mostly unused). Hotjar to understand visitors (£39/mo, glanced at once a quarter). And every quarter, an external strategy consultant for £900 — to explain numbers we already had in two other tools.

What Scarif replaced

All of it. Email campaigns now generate from the brand voice doc directly into Klaviyo via the integration — no copywriter needed. Ad creatives use the same voice + product data + brand asset library to generate Meta-ready ads in 5 minutes. Strategy memos and content plans are produced monthly inside the tool, citing real Shopify and Meta numbers. The brand voice itself drives everything — every output reads like TRI, not like generic AI.

Why it was different from another LLM wrapper

Brand voice is upstream of every other marketing decision, and Scarif is the only tool that treats it as a first-class object. The voice doc lives at the core. Every gen reads from it. When a campaign needs an angle, the strategy memo references the voice. When an email needs a CTA, the email engine pulls voice tokens. There's no copy-pasting brand context into ChatGPT for every gen — the context is already there, every time.

What didn't work — and what we built to fix it

The first ad-creative builder was a 7-step wizard. Tom hated it after using it twice and rebuilt it as a single-page form (now the standard pattern across every gen workflow). The video gen had cost surprises before spend caps existed. We built per-feature spend caps (hourly + daily + monthly) with hard auto-pause. Every painful interaction with the tool became a feature.

The result

The Rum Infusionist runs a £200K-revenue craft drinks business with one founder, no marketing team, and no agency. The marketing engine costs £149/month. The math is simple: one extra bottle of rum sold per month covers the entire marketing tool stack.

✓ Tools replaced with Scarif Studio
KlaviyoCanva ProChatGPT PlusLoomlyTriple WhaleHotjarStrategy consultant
Reviewed and approved by Tom Conway, founder of TRI and Scarif One · Published 2026-05-02

Want results like The Rum Infusionist?

14-day money-back guarantee. Tom personally guarantees: doesn’t work = full refund.

Start free trial →More stories